<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do your firm&#8217;s managers spy on employees?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docucrunch.com/do-your-firms-managers-spy-on-employees/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/do-your-firms-managers-spy-on-employees</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rohr</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/do-your-firms-managers-spy-on-employees/comment-page-1#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1384#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>What this article fails to expound upon is if the &quot;personal&quot; email account was accessed by the employee using the company&#039;s computers &amp; network while she was employed by them.

That equipment is not her personal property and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy while using it.  Anything that might be logged while &quot;monitoring&quot; their own kit is a perfectly legal procedure.

However, as is implied by the wording of this article - her boss seems to have taken information gathered during that monitoring and then used it to subsequently access a system owned by a third party.  THAT is where he crossed the line.  By using a password that might have been captured from their own system to access another system - her boss fraudulently accessed that system - pretending to be her.

That is a Crime.  ANYONE accessing any computer system and masquerading as another person is committing the crime of fraud - as well as a number of hacking-related statutes.

Her boss may have FELT that he needed to act in order to ascertain if she had stolen trade-secrets, etc..  However by taking action he became a vigilante.  The only proper course of action was to divulge any internal logs to Law Enforcement and to issue Cease &amp; Desist letters through their own attourneys.

Privacy IS a legal RIGHT in the USA.  It may not have been included in the original draft of the constitution explicetly however it was established through the use of the court systems decades ago.  The erosion of a citizen&#039;s Rights in order to secure the interests of Corporations flirts with Facism.

The article fails to mention if any actual dammage was rendered TO the offending company in addition to that rendered BY them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this article fails to expound upon is if the &#8220;personal&#8221; email account was accessed by the employee using the company&#8217;s computers &amp; network while she was employed by them.</p>
<p>That equipment is not her personal property and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy while using it.  Anything that might be logged while &#8220;monitoring&#8221; their own kit is a perfectly legal procedure.</p>
<p>However, as is implied by the wording of this article &#8211; her boss seems to have taken information gathered during that monitoring and then used it to subsequently access a system owned by a third party.  THAT is where he crossed the line.  By using a password that might have been captured from their own system to access another system &#8211; her boss fraudulently accessed that system &#8211; pretending to be her.</p>
<p>That is a Crime.  ANYONE accessing any computer system and masquerading as another person is committing the crime of fraud &#8211; as well as a number of hacking-related statutes.</p>
<p>Her boss may have FELT that he needed to act in order to ascertain if she had stolen trade-secrets, etc..  However by taking action he became a vigilante.  The only proper course of action was to divulge any internal logs to Law Enforcement and to issue Cease &amp; Desist letters through their own attourneys.</p>
<p>Privacy IS a legal RIGHT in the USA.  It may not have been included in the original draft of the constitution explicetly however it was established through the use of the court systems decades ago.  The erosion of a citizen&#8217;s Rights in order to secure the interests of Corporations flirts with Facism.</p>
<p>The article fails to mention if any actual dammage was rendered TO the offending company in addition to that rendered BY them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy is overrated</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/do-your-firms-managers-spy-on-employees/comment-page-1#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy is overrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1384#comment-498</guid>
		<description>This article demonstrates a problem with privacy laws.  The employee claims her privacy rights were violated because her boss was reading her email.  However, I&#039;m sure he was not just reading it for a good time.  He suspected she was leaking company sensitive information, obviously trying to hide it by using her personal email account rather than a company email account.  It appears he was right.  So where does the company&#039;s right to protecting its information fit into this equation?  Instead of her being punished for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets, she gets $400,000.  Where is the justice in that?  There can be no justice when privacy laws are absolute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article demonstrates a problem with privacy laws.  The employee claims her privacy rights were violated because her boss was reading her email.  However, I&#8217;m sure he was not just reading it for a good time.  He suspected she was leaking company sensitive information, obviously trying to hide it by using her personal email account rather than a company email account.  It appears he was right.  So where does the company&#8217;s right to protecting its information fit into this equation?  Instead of her being punished for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets, she gets $400,000.  Where is the justice in that?  There can be no justice when privacy laws are absolute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: printer cartridge supplies</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/do-your-firms-managers-spy-on-employees/comment-page-1#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>printer cartridge supplies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1384#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I guess the word &quot; spy&quot; is not the right term whenever managers supervises and monitor their employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the word &#8221; spy&#8221; is not the right term whenever managers supervises and monitor their employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/do-your-firms-managers-spy-on-employees/comment-page-1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1384#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Please define difference between &quot;monitoring&quot; &amp; &quot;accessing&quot;.
So was this a case where the manager accessed emails stored by a third party? 
Again, what&#039;s the difference between &quot;monitoring&quot; &amp; &quot;accessing&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please define difference between &#8220;monitoring&#8221; &amp; &#8220;accessing&#8221;.<br />
So was this a case where the manager accessed emails stored by a third party?<br />
Again, what&#8217;s the difference between &#8220;monitoring&#8221; &amp; &#8220;accessing&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2012-02-11 08:33:08 -->
