<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-mailing at home: The latest legal trap?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docucrunch.com/e-mailing-at-home-the-latest-legal-trap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/e-mailing-at-home-the-latest-legal-trap</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/e-mailing-at-home-the-latest-legal-trap/comment-page-1#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1499#comment-484</guid>
		<description>It may take a few seconds to reply to an email, but it may take hours to think about the right response, and, a work email is an intrusion on private time and can disrupt the whole day, especially if it causes aggravation. 
Both exempt and non exempt employees should be compensated in one way or another. For example, I am exempt and I am given more flexibility in my daily hours. Furthermore, no employer has the right to harass employees off hours, at any level of management. I bet I could prove this to be unconstitutional, and I&#039;m not an attorney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may take a few seconds to reply to an email, but it may take hours to think about the right response, and, a work email is an intrusion on private time and can disrupt the whole day, especially if it causes aggravation.<br />
Both exempt and non exempt employees should be compensated in one way or another. For example, I am exempt and I am given more flexibility in my daily hours. Furthermore, no employer has the right to harass employees off hours, at any level of management. I bet I could prove this to be unconstitutional, and I&#8217;m not an attorney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/e-mailing-at-home-the-latest-legal-trap/comment-page-1#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1499#comment-481</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no HR expert, but from my training I was always told that Hourly works who are required to be waiting for &quot;on call&quot; duty after hrs and on weekends, need to be paid for that time. You may want to look into that issue further</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no HR expert, but from my training I was always told that Hourly works who are required to be waiting for &#8220;on call&#8221; duty after hrs and on weekends, need to be paid for that time. You may want to look into that issue further</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. B.</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/e-mailing-at-home-the-latest-legal-trap/comment-page-1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>R. B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1499#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I would never expect a non-exempt employee to work off the clock.  If we&#039;re talking about taking 2 minutes of their time and it&#039;s something that doesn&#039;t happen very often, that would be one thing.  But if we&#039;re talking about 5 minutes here, 10 minutes there, night after night, they should certainly be paid.  It could add up quickly to be quite a bit of time during a work week.  I guess I&#039;m a little surprised that a company like T-Mobile USA would think otherwise.  You can&#039;t make company policies that violate state or federal law...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would never expect a non-exempt employee to work off the clock.  If we&#8217;re talking about taking 2 minutes of their time and it&#8217;s something that doesn&#8217;t happen very often, that would be one thing.  But if we&#8217;re talking about 5 minutes here, 10 minutes there, night after night, they should certainly be paid.  It could add up quickly to be quite a bit of time during a work week.  I guess I&#8217;m a little surprised that a company like T-Mobile USA would think otherwise.  You can&#8217;t make company policies that violate state or federal law&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juanita</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/e-mailing-at-home-the-latest-legal-trap/comment-page-1#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Juanita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1499#comment-184</guid>
		<description>We are a non-profit organization and we have Case Managers who are non-exempted; however,  part of some Case Managers&#039; job responsibilities is that they be on call during off-hours and weekends, available for consultation on an as needed basis. Therefore, from what I just read regarding &quot;e-mailing at home&quot; regardless if it is voluntary or non-voluntary a non-exempt employee  must be paid for those hours even if it is part of their job responsibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are a non-profit organization and we have Case Managers who are non-exempted; however,  part of some Case Managers&#8217; job responsibilities is that they be on call during off-hours and weekends, available for consultation on an as needed basis. Therefore, from what I just read regarding &#8220;e-mailing at home&#8221; regardless if it is voluntary or non-voluntary a non-exempt employee  must be paid for those hours even if it is part of their job responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocuCrunch.com » Blog Archive » E-mailing at home: The latest &#8230; &#124; lost-travel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/e-mailing-at-home-the-latest-legal-trap/comment-page-1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>DocuCrunch.com » Blog Archive » E-mailing at home: The latest &#8230; &#124; lost-travel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1499#comment-163</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original here:  DocuCrunch.com » Blog Archive » E-mailing at home: The latest &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original here:  DocuCrunch.com » Blog Archive » E-mailing at home: The latest &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/14 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2012-02-11 08:35:15 -->
