<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One deleted e-mail lands company in court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docucrunch.com/one-deleted-e-mail-lands-company-in-court/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/one-deleted-e-mail-lands-company-in-court</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:00:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bstarck</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/one-deleted-e-mail-lands-company-in-court/comment-page-1#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>bstarck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1176#comment-225</guid>
		<description>JParr says &quot;Industry best practice right now is to preserve all e-mail for 1 year&quot;.That is NOT a records management best practice.

Actually e-mail should be managed to it&#039;s content.  E-mail is ONLY a vehicle for transmitting information.  As a broad example, if your retention policy for HR documents is 10 years, then e-mail regarding HR issues needs to be kept for 10 years.  If your retention policy for facilities documents is 3 years, then e-mail regarding facilites needs to be kept for 3 years.

Again, it&#039;s about managing the content of the information, not the media it&#039;s delivered on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JParr says &#8220;Industry best practice right now is to preserve all e-mail for 1 year&#8221;.That is NOT a records management best practice.</p>
<p>Actually e-mail should be managed to it&#8217;s content.  E-mail is ONLY a vehicle for transmitting information.  As a broad example, if your retention policy for HR documents is 10 years, then e-mail regarding HR issues needs to be kept for 10 years.  If your retention policy for facilities documents is 3 years, then e-mail regarding facilites needs to be kept for 3 years.</p>
<p>Again, it&#8217;s about managing the content of the information, not the media it&#8217;s delivered on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JParr</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/one-deleted-e-mail-lands-company-in-court/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>JParr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=1176#comment-84</guid>
		<description>The revised FRCP rules around eDiscovery are what tripped this company up.  There is no &quot;hard and fast&quot; rule around what the courts require, because the rule itself is subject to interpretation by the courts.  Although there is no firm precedent, &quot;Industry best practice&quot; right now is to preserve all e-mail for 1 year.

KEEPING e-mail longer than your retention policy can also get the company in trouble.  Having 10 years of e-mail means that all 10 years have to be disclosed during the discovery phase of legal proceedings, and there can be lots of stuff in 10 years of e-mail that allows the other side to build a case against your company.  

As an example, let&#039;s say that budget time rolls around, and the facility engineer recommends replacing an older fire supression system.  Budgets are tight, and the manager responds in e-mail, &quot;not this year, next year&quot;.  Next year rolls around, and the same thing happens.  Having BOTH e-mails from the manager telling the facility engineer &quot;not this year...&quot; could be grounds for negligence in the event that the fire supression system fails, causing damage or injury.

Another example is &quot;jokes&quot; in e-mail.  If your company institutes a policy against jokes in e-mail, but you have 10 years of e-mail, someone could find &quot;joke e-mails&quot; from 10 years ago as support in a sexual harassment or discrimination suit.  The company would have to go back and document its policies at the time the e-mail was sent, and even if there was no policy against joke e-mails at the time, it helps establish tha the company culture tolerates (x or y) sort of behavior.

As the article mentions, once the company is notified of legal action, ALL LEGAL EVIDENCE SHOULD BE PRESERVED IMMEDIATELY.  If your IT folks are not trained in &quot;chain of custody&quot; procedures, have the lawyers bring in an outside IT firm that specializes in forensics and legal discovery procedures.  Having an outside company perform the discovery looks better, because there is no opportunity for coersion or bias based on friendships or reporting structure within the company.

In order to accomodate the revised FRCP rules, and to facilitate eDiscovery, many companies are implementing e-mail archiving solutions that automatically story a copy of e-mail on a separate server.  Many so-called &quot;archiving&quot; solutions just capture internet e-mail -- just the messages between your company and your customers or vendors (or your Aunt Betsy if you use corporate e-mail for personal use), but do NOT capture internal e-mails, such as the ones between you and your manager or subordinates.  If you implement an automated e-mail archive solution, make sure it captures everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The revised FRCP rules around eDiscovery are what tripped this company up.  There is no &#8220;hard and fast&#8221; rule around what the courts require, because the rule itself is subject to interpretation by the courts.  Although there is no firm precedent, &#8220;Industry best practice&#8221; right now is to preserve all e-mail for 1 year.</p>
<p>KEEPING e-mail longer than your retention policy can also get the company in trouble.  Having 10 years of e-mail means that all 10 years have to be disclosed during the discovery phase of legal proceedings, and there can be lots of stuff in 10 years of e-mail that allows the other side to build a case against your company.  </p>
<p>As an example, let&#8217;s say that budget time rolls around, and the facility engineer recommends replacing an older fire supression system.  Budgets are tight, and the manager responds in e-mail, &#8220;not this year, next year&#8221;.  Next year rolls around, and the same thing happens.  Having BOTH e-mails from the manager telling the facility engineer &#8220;not this year&#8230;&#8221; could be grounds for negligence in the event that the fire supression system fails, causing damage or injury.</p>
<p>Another example is &#8220;jokes&#8221; in e-mail.  If your company institutes a policy against jokes in e-mail, but you have 10 years of e-mail, someone could find &#8220;joke e-mails&#8221; from 10 years ago as support in a sexual harassment or discrimination suit.  The company would have to go back and document its policies at the time the e-mail was sent, and even if there was no policy against joke e-mails at the time, it helps establish tha the company culture tolerates (x or y) sort of behavior.</p>
<p>As the article mentions, once the company is notified of legal action, ALL LEGAL EVIDENCE SHOULD BE PRESERVED IMMEDIATELY.  If your IT folks are not trained in &#8220;chain of custody&#8221; procedures, have the lawyers bring in an outside IT firm that specializes in forensics and legal discovery procedures.  Having an outside company perform the discovery looks better, because there is no opportunity for coersion or bias based on friendships or reporting structure within the company.</p>
<p>In order to accomodate the revised FRCP rules, and to facilitate eDiscovery, many companies are implementing e-mail archiving solutions that automatically story a copy of e-mail on a separate server.  Many so-called &#8220;archiving&#8221; solutions just capture internet e-mail &#8212; just the messages between your company and your customers or vendors (or your Aunt Betsy if you use corporate e-mail for personal use), but do NOT capture internal e-mails, such as the ones between you and your manager or subordinates.  If you implement an automated e-mail archive solution, make sure it captures everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/12 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-07-31 04:50:30 -->