Study: Remanufactured cartridges can double costs
June 9, 2009 by Sam NarisiPosted in: Dealers & Channel, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views
Remanufactured toner cartridges often go for at least 30% less than their name-brand counterparts. But experts warn not to be tempted by the short-term advantage.
The total cost of ownership for a remanufactured cartridge is double that of an OEM cartridge, according to a recent study conducted by QualityLogic and commissioned by HP.
Despite the initial cost savings, an HP spokesperson said, those cheaper cartridges don’t last as long and produce pages that often need to be reprinted anyway. According to the study of 2,500 business:
- 10% of remanufactured cartridges were dead on arrival or failed prematurely, and
- 15% produced pages of “limited or no use” at least half the time.
Dead cartridges, wasted paper and the time spent on reprints add up to create the high TCO. “SMBs who think they can achieve cost savings by choosing remanufactured cartridges are making a mistake,” said QualityLogic CEO Dave Jollota, “by not factoring in the hidden costs from reprints, replacement cartridges and additional labour costs from having to diagnose and fix printing problems.”
Our note: There are reputable remanufacturers who produce pretty good profits. If you have found one, that’s fine. Managed print services (Link to earlier story), for example, can stand by the quality of the products they supply. But the replacement industry is full of fly-by-night operations. Unless you have the time to fully test and track the page yield of the cartridges you are supplied, stick to the original manufacturer.
DocuCrunch.com delivers the latest IT and Imaging news once a week to the inboxes of over 200,000 IT and Imaging professionals.
Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to DocuCrunch!
Tags: Hewlett-Packard, HP, OEM cartridges, remanufactured cartridges, total cost of ownership
Loading ...
June 17th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
Sure, a study commissioned by HP is finding that non-HP brand ink cartridges are not as good. I would be as likely to believe that as a health study funded by Marlboro that cigarettes are not bad for your lungs. In my experience, equivalent-replacement cartridges by Rosewill and Linkyo perform just as well as HP and Brother toner cartridges. For example, a single HP 12a cartridge costing about $60 performs NO BETTER than one from a competitor costing $95 for a 5-pack (that’s $19 each!).
No thank you, HP. I will continue to buy “compatible” alternative cartridges.
August 17th, 2009 at 4:00 am
I think programmes such as these are great. I shall see whether there are more people that are interested in helping
December 23rd, 2009 at 7:49 pm
I am not a brand loyalist, but I bought a Staples brand toner cartridge for my HP laser printer and found that the printouts were of considerably lower quality than those made from the HP cartridge. The toner simply did not adhere to the paper as well. I switched back to HP and saw a marked improvement in print quality. I won’t claim that this was by any means a scientific study, but for me at least, it wasn’t worth the lower price, and it wasn’t nearly as big a savings as Hoopla reports.