<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DocuCrunch.com &#187; documents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docucrunch.com/tag/documents/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docucrunch.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:18:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>One common mistake companies make when shredding docs</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/one-common-mistake-companies-make-when-shredding-docs</link>
		<comments>http://www.docucrunch.com/one-common-mistake-companies-make-when-shredding-docs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hannaford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shredding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=3530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A lot of businesses hire contractors to shred their sensitive documents. It can be a smart way to save on equipment costs and staff time &#8212; but if those companies aren&#8217;t careful, they could be opening themselves up to serious security threats. 
Increasing legal liability and the need to protect company secrets has made shredding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1359" title="Shredded" src="http://www.docucrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/shredder.jpg" alt="Shredded" width="425" height="282" /></p>
<p>A lot of businesses hire contractors to shred their sensitive documents. It can be a smart way to save on equipment costs and staff time &#8212; but if those companies aren&#8217;t careful, they could be opening themselves up to serious security threats. <span id="more-3530"></span></p>
<p>Increasing legal liability and the need to protect company secrets has made shredding more important than ever. But is this a function that you want to keep in house or is it something that you should contract out?</p>
<p>A growing number of companies offer shredding services that will manage the shredding and disposal of your sensitive documents just as you might hire a company to clean your offices or haul your trash. This can relieve you of the need to buy your own equipment or have your company&#8217;s employees handle the responsibility of shredding and disposal.</p>
<p>But there are some pitfalls to watch out for. The biggest mistake companies make: using services that have the paper hauled off site before it is shredded.</p>
<p>That would leave you open to the same possible breaches of security, as confidential material could get lost, mishandled, or deliberately purloined between your site and a centralized shredding company. This is not meant to accuse those services of being dishonest or incompetent. But once paper&#8217;s taken off your premises, any number of things can happen that could expose your info to a higher level of risk &#8212; and risk minimization is the whole point of shredding.</p>
<p>Increasingly common are companies that will come to your site with a shredding machine in tow (mounted, for example, in a truck) and perform the shredding on site. This certainly cuts down on your exposure. Such batch shredding may make sense if you have only low-sensitivity documents that you can afford to pile up during the day. But there’s still a problem of protecting more confidential papers that are waiting around for the shredders to do their job.</p>
<p>Another strategy for larger organizations is to set up a dedicated, centralized shredding facility on site (whether with internal employees or with the help of an external vendor). The center’s staff might come around to pick up papers to be shredded several times a day, lessening the problem of accumulating sensitive documents. However, it doesn’t solve the problem of highly sensitive documents being possibly seen by prying eyes inside the location.</p>
<p>The most secure method is to have a mix of shredding machines, both workgroup and personal, available in your office with employees responsible for shredding their own documents. Those with highly sensitive documents might have a shredder by their desks. Others might walk over to a departmental shredder located, for example, next to the copier or fax machine. This individual responsibility approach is becoming more common and the culture of using shredders just like any office machine is growing. Of all approaches, it offers the highest level of security.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the best shredding strategy? That depends on the sensitivity of the documents in question. Some firms will take a mix of approaches. For example, employees that work with documents that require top-level security might have personal shredders at their desks, while less risky docs might be shredded by a third party.</p>
<p>How does your company handle the shredding of sensitive documents? Let us know in the comments section below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.docucrunch.com/one-common-mistake-companies-make-when-shredding-docs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey: 38 minutes looking for a document?</title>
		<link>http://www.docucrunch.com/survey-38-minutes-looking-for-a-document</link>
		<comments>http://www.docucrunch.com/survey-38-minutes-looking-for-a-document#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docucrunch.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite technological advances in information search tools, important documents are still hard to find at many companies. 
Employees at big companies spend an average of 38 minutes (that&#8217;s right, minutes) looking for each single document on their own computers or the company&#8217;s network, according to a survey by Reccomind, an enterprise search firm.
Why so long? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite technological advances in information search tools, important documents are still hard to find at many companies. <span id="more-910"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1185" title="searching" src="http://www.docucrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/searching.jpg" alt="searching" width="205" height="205" />Employees at big companies spend an average of 38 minutes (that&#8217;s right, minutes) looking for each single document on their own computers or the company&#8217;s network, according to a <a href="http://www.recommind.com/node/667" target="_blank">survey</a> by Reccomind, an enterprise search firm.</p>
<p>Why so long? The main problem is a lack of tools &#8211; just 42% of the companies surveyed have an enterprise-wide search system in place. So when employees need something, they&#8217;re forced to lose less-efficient methods, like browsing through files or calling around to request a copy.&#8221; Furthermore, the survey says that &#8220;9% of employees haven&#8217;t been briefed &#8211; either by an IT manager or legal department representative &#8211; about the role email plays in lawsuits and eDiscovery events.&#8221;</p>
<p>The survey notes among other things that &#8220;when looking  for documents, 71% of employees trawl the corporate network / server, 60% send an email / IM requesting to have it sent and 35% simply call someone&#8221;</p>
<p>Information is certainly easier to come by in smaller organizations &#8211; but their employees likely still waste a good chunk of time trying to track down documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.docucrunch.com/survey-38-minutes-looking-for-a-document/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/16 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-07-31 04:51:52 -->